Unintended Consequences of Standardization
Greetings,
I was
talking to a MM the other day (let’s call him Jim) from a large
health system about the “unintended consequences” of hospital
supply chain standardization which naturally peaked his interest. I
told Jim that if he continues solely down the standardization path,
as he had done for years, he will save money over the short-term,
but over the long-term it will actually cost him and his
customer’s time, money will even lower his quality…over time!
Now that
I had Jim’s attention, He wanted to learn more about this concept,
so that I thought I would let you overhear this conversation with
this MM so you can learn from our empirical experience and then
employ this transformational idea at your own healthcare
organization.
I went
on to tell Jim that over the last nine years we have observed that
no “one size fits all” value groups (segmentation of
customers by their functional requirements) when it comes to product
selection. If he tries to standardize on one product, service or
technology at any one of his hospitals or system-wide he will find
that he will be OVERSHOOTING or UNDERSHOOTING the target 97% of the
time, which will cost him money.
I gave
Jim this real life example to prove my point. Setting in on
a value analysis team meeting one day, before the meeting even
started I heard the Chief Radiology Tech ask the hospital’s Director
of Material Management, “Who decided to standardize on fitted sheets
for every hospital department recently.” The MM then stated that
the Environmental Services Department made this decision. Well, the
Tech stated briskly and annoyingly “that this decision was costing
her department time, money and quality since the Radiology
Department has always used flat sheets to transfer their patients
from a gurney to the x-ray table then back again”, and they can’t do
this with a fitted sheet. That’s when this MM quickly realized that
“one size doesn’t fit” all staff or department’s requirements and
promised to solve this problem immediately.
Jim said
that he had heard stories like this before at his own hospitals and
now could see clearly how standardization could have
“unintended consequences” which would cost him time, money, and
quality over time. I left this meeting with Jim feeling that I had
made one more convert to this myth destroying idea that
standardization does indeed have “unintended consequences”
that are costing our healthcare organizations BILLIONS annually in
unneeded and unnecessary over or underspecified products, service
and technologies. Does this make sense to you too?
Your Partner In Savings Beyond Price™,

Robert T Yokl
Chief Value Strategist
Strategic Value Analysis® In Healthcare
Bobpres@strategicva.com
1-800-220-4274
P.S. We
just rolled out our new two-day (on-site)
Advanced Value Analysis Training Program
where
participant’s report immediate success with the techniques and
strategies they learn on the very first day. Isn’t it time you
consider having your value analysis team trained to improve their
performance too?
|
***Just
Released***
Free Special
Report

Supply Chain
Utilization
Targeting your next
big savings opportunities
"Could a misalignment that comes with a simple (and less
costly) fix be eating away at your savings?"
"Beware of Standardization"
"Managing utilization costs can save six to 10 percent on
total supply expenditures"
Click
Here for the Special Report |
The
Savings Beyond Price Blog Is Back and Better than ever!
View Here
